MOTIVATING TOMORROW’S ENGINEERS
William Done, Peter Willmot
Pages: 57-71
Published: 27 Aug 2015
Views: 3,248
Downloads: 610
Abstract: Engineering has higher drop-out rates from university than many other subjects. One widely agreed reason for non-completion is the lack of motivation to study while on course. Data from focus groups and two separate surveys compares the views of UK engineering students with those of their international counterparts, asking: why do students take up engineering and what motivates them to sustain their studies? The research suggests students choose engineering, not only as it matches their pre-existing academic strengths, but also because they have a long-existing passion for technology. Unsurprisingly, a very large proportion of those surveyed explicitly claim their single largest motivator is the prospect of a potentially rewarding career. Nevertheless, a combination of unengaging lecturers and a lack of overall support and feedback take their toll and many students rapidly become disengaged with their studies. The international views were closely aligned but strong themes emerged illustrating the importance of creative, real-world teaching and criticising lecturers who lack passion and communication skill.
Keywords: motivations, engagement, engineering education
Cite this article: William Done, Peter Willmot. MOTIVATING TOMORROW’S ENGINEERS. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives 13, 57-71 (2015). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000916/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.