ECO-EFFICIENCY INDICATORS: CONCEPT, TYPES AND APPLICABILITY
Virginia Zhelyazkova
Pages: 322-331
Published: 28 Aug 2016
Views: 1,979
Downloads: 472
Abstract: The importance of eco-efficiency has been gaining momentum for the last years. This concept crystalized in the 1990s as a result of multi-layer and multi-aspect tendencies that were taking place in different parts of the world since the beginning of the 1960s. The major step which has been done is reaching the point of wide societal consensus that if quality of life and economic output is to continue to grow, ways need to be found that the economies produce more with less. This is the kernel of the eco-efficiency concept. In order progress to be made towards it, however, pertinent indicators need to be identified and supported both at organizational and at county level. The current paper aims at presenting the concept of eco-efficiency and some of the widely used indicators to date – those defined during the Round Table on Eco-efficiency organized by the Government of Canada, the ones proposed by the UNESCAP and the ones put forward by Muller and Strum. After that their applicability is being discussed in view of their practical usage.
Keywords: eco-efficiency, eco-efficiency indicators, circular economy
Cite this article: Virginia Zhelyazkova. ECO-EFFICIENCY INDICATORS: CONCEPT, TYPES AND APPLICABILITY. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Economy & Business 10, 322-331 (2016). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001243/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.