EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS PRODUCTIVITY OF MOTOR-MANUAL FELLING WITH A CATALYTIC CHAINSAW
Vasiliki Dimou, Metaxeni S. Symeonidou
Pages: 187-198
Published: 18 Sep 2019
Views: 901
Downloads: 85
Abstract: The evolution and constant development of chainsaws aims at the increase of their productivity, their ergonomic improvement as well as their eco-friendliness. The use of catalytic chainsaws in timber harvesting operations is in line with this eco-friendly approach. In the present paper an attempt is made to assess the productivity of a Stihl MS 170D catalytic chainsaw compared with a conventional Stihl MS 181 saw. The aim of the present research was to perform a time study of timber harvesting operations with a view to comparing the productivity of a catalytic and a conventional chainsaw. According to the results of the research, the hourly production of the catalytic chainsaw with and without delays was 3.35 cubic meters per hour (12 trees/hour) and 3.48 cubic meters per hour (13 trees/hour), respectively. The hourly production of the conventional saw with and without delays was 3.42 cubic meters per hour (14 trees/hour) and 3.91 cubic meters per hour (16 trees/hour), respectively. Finally, the average time in minutes required for the production of a cubic meter of timber was 28.27 min/cub.m. and 24.21 min/cub.m. for the catalytic and the conventional saw respectively. The results showed that there is nearly no difference between Stihl MS 170D and Stihl MS 181.
Keywords: chainsaw, catalytic, timber harvesting, time study
Cite this article: Vasiliki Dimou, Metaxeni S. Symeonidou. EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS PRODUCTIVITY OF MOTOR-MANUAL FELLING WITH A CATALYTIC CHAINSAW. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Materials, Methods & Technologies 13, 187-198 (2019). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001894/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.