THE VIEWS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS ON THE CHOSEN DIDACTIC MEANS USED IN THE PRACTICAL TRAINING ON MEDICAL BIOPHYSICS
Eva Kralova
Pages: 284-290
Published: 13 Oct 2019
Views: 890
Downloads: 69
Abstract: Student of medicine as direct participant of pregradual university education, according generally accepted norms, can take part not only in the creation of study programmes, syllabus of scientific subjects, but also in their evaluation and qualitative improvement. On the other hand, the role of university medical teacher generally consists in the preparation of optimal study conditions, providing impulses and directions for student´s individual study work, and in the same time, in the creation of good-quality teaching programmes and study literature compatible with the valid standards for medical study. Pedagogical investigation using anonymous questionnaire was used with the aim to specify respondents (1st year students Faculty Medicine Comenius University in Bratislava) attitudes and opinions toward some aspects of teaching and didactic means used in the practical training on medical biophysics.
Keywords: medical education, pedagogical investigation, student´s attitudes, medical biophysics
Cite this article: Eva Kralova. THE VIEWS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS ON THE CHOSEN DIDACTIC MEANS USED IN THE PRACTICAL TRAINING ON MEDICAL BIOPHYSICS. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives 17, 284-290 (2019). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001996/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.