C.S. LEWIS: MODERNIST OR ANTI-MODERNIST? HIS RESPONSE TO HIS TIMES
Iulia-Teodora Driscu
Pages: 151-160
Published: 19 Oct 2023
DOI: 10.62991/LIS1996098951
Views: 240
Downloads: 22
Abstract: C.S. Lewis lived during the turbulent 20th century, a time when literature was divided between the modernists, who sought to innovate the art of writing, and the anti-modernists, conservative writers who tried to keep the classical values of the past. This paper intends to analyse the way Lewis approached the dominant literary movement of his times, modernism, both in his theoretical writings and in his fiction. It brings examples from a large variety of sources, including not only his literary essays, articles or academic works, but also his greatly loved Chronicles of Narnia or The Space Trilogy. The discussion it instigates helps better understand this author’s place inside (or outside) the literary canon and the reasons behind such a categorisation. Its novelty lies in the way it examines the primary material and especially in the question it raises: how can we situate Lewis related to his times, as an adherent to the modernist creed or a dissident?
Keywords: lewis, modernism, fiction, canon, myth, transcendence
Cite this article: Iulia-Teodora Driscu. C.S. LEWIS: MODERNIST OR ANTI-MODERNIST? HIS RESPONSE TO HIS TIMES. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual & Society 17, 151-160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.62991/LIS1996098951
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.