TOOL FOR CHANGE OR JUST MORE EMAIL SPAM? A STUDY OF ON-LINE PETITIONS AND THEIR EFFICACY
Lynn M. Hamilton
Strony: 170-179
Opublikowano: 1 Jan 2013
Wyświetlenia: 249
Pobrania: 19
Streszczenie: This paper examines a set of two hundred on-line petitions that were produced by the same two-person team over the course of eight months. While only a few of them were completely successful--as measured by full compliance with the petition request, it is possible to draw a few tentative conclusions about what factors contribute to a successful petition. The most important factors in successful on-line petitions would seem to be: email distribution to a targeted list of socially active individuals who share the same core political and social beliefs that underlie the petition; targets who belong to a stable, democratic nation with an established history of protecting free expression; and very specific, easily achievable requests that do not represent significant expenditure or effort on the part of the party who is called on to take action.
Słowa kluczowe: petition, social change, advocacy, politics, feng jianmei, pussy riot, hy-vee, lange’s metalmark butterfly
Cytowanie artykułu: Lynn M. Hamilton. TOOL FOR CHANGE OR JUST MORE EMAIL SPAM? A STUDY OF ON-LINE PETITIONS AND THEIR EFFICACY. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Media & Mass Communication 2, 170-179 (2013). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1002982/
Powrót do spisu treści tomu
© 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The Publisher and/or the editor(s) are not responsible for the statements, opinions, and data contained in any published works. These are solely the views of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The Publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim any liability for injury to individuals or property arising from the ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
