ASSESSMENT OF BIOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANTS AND YIELD OF SELECTED WINTER VARIETIES OF GARLIC
Ewa Rekowska
Pages: 251-256
Published: 1 Jun 2014
Views: 3,474
Downloads: 866
Abstract: Garlic producers in Poland mostly grow local ecotypes, unbalanced in morphological and functional characteristics, which influences the fluctuation of the yield in subsequent years (Nużyńska-Wierdak 1998). Therefore, there is a need of a broader introduction to cultivation of farm varieties, characterised by a high and good quality yield and good storage properties. The purpose of conducted studies was the comparison of the growth dynamics and plant development of four Polish garlic varieties (Arkus, Harnaś, Huzar and Orlik) designated for winter cultivation. Significant diversity of assessed parameters in studied varieties was proved. Harnaś variety stood out from the assessed garlic varieties. The highest percentage of germinations was noticed in case of cultivation of this variety, the plants reached the biggest height and had the longest leaves; the harvested crop of bulbs was significantly bigger in comparison to the other varieties.
Keywords: winter variety garlic, selected phytometric parameters, yield
Cite this article: Ewa Rekowska. ASSESSMENT OF BIOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANTS AND YIELD OF SELECTED WINTER VARIETIES OF GARLIC. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Agriculture & Food 2, 251-256 (2014). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000035/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.