THE ESTIMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES LEVEL WITH THE HELP OF MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS (ON THE BANK STAFF EXAMPLE)

Ekaterina V. Limonova

Choose language

Economy & Business 2025, 24th International Conference

17-20 August, Burgas, Bulgaria

Call for Papers

Economy & Business, Volume 8, 2014

THE ESTIMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES LEVEL WITH THE HELP OF MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS (ON THE BANK STAFF EXAMPLE)

Ekaterina V. Limonova

Pages: 216-223
Published: 29 Aug 2014
Views: 3,161
Downloads: 678

Abstract: In this article the possibilities of the estimation of bank personnel’s usage are examining with the help of the regressive model of the professional competence. The advantages of its usage are revealed in the HRM system. The most important competences for the banking activity are described. The results of the usage of the estimation of the banking personnel’s activity under the working results for a period of half a year in one of the largest Russian banks are presented.

Keywords: hrm system professional competence the multiple regression model personnel’s estimation during the half year period

Cite this article: Ekaterina V. Limonova. THE ESTIMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES LEVEL WITH THE HELP OF MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS (ON THE BANK STAFF EXAMPLE). Journal of International Scientific Publications: Economy & Business 8, 216-223 (2014). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000379/

Download full text

Back to the contents of the volume

© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.

Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.