EVALUATION OF PLANTAIN AND COWPEA BLENDS FOR COMPLEMENTARY FOODS
Abiodun A. Olapade, Kafaya A. Babalola, Ogugua C. Aworh
Pages: 274-288
Published: 23 May 2015
Views: 2,995
Downloads: 1,297
Abstract: Complementary foods were produced from plantain and cowpea flours using ratios 70/30, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60 and 30/70. The samples were evaluated for chemical composition, functional and pasting properties. Moreover, the nutritional evaluation of the diets was done through rat feeding. Protein efficiency ratio (PER), Net protein retention (NPR), True digestibility (TD) were estimated. Blood samples were also collected for hematological analysis. The blends were prepared for sensory evaluation by cooking with addition of sucrose and vegetable oil. A commercial proprietary weaning food was used as control. The protein content ranged from 13.60 to 22.67% and it increased with increase in cowpea inclusion. The energy content ranged from 351 to 355.03kcal/100g and it was highest in 70/30 blend. There were significant differences (p<0.05) in the dispersibility, water absorption capacity, loose and packed bulk densities and pasting characteristics evaluated. Highest mean weight gain (73.36g) was obtained from rats fed the skimmed milk diet followed by rat fed 30/70(28.04g) and the least (13.07g) was obtained from 50/50 blend. The net protein utilization (NPU) ranged from 43.6 to 75.4% while the true digestibility was highest for rats fed 30/70 blend followed by rats fed the control diet. No significant differences (P>0.05) were obtained from hematological parameters measured. The 60/40 plantain-cowpea complementary food was next to the control in terms of aroma with the score 5.70, while 50/50 plantain-cowpea complementary food was scored best in terms of texture with 5.70.
Keywords: plantain, cowpea, complementary foods. nutritive value, consumer acceptance
Cite this article: Abiodun A. Olapade, Kafaya A. Babalola, Ogugua C. Aworh. EVALUATION OF PLANTAIN AND COWPEA BLENDS FOR COMPLEMENTARY FOODS. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Agriculture & Food 3, 274-288 (2015). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000683/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.