THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE PROCESSING IN EFL (ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE) READING SKILLS ACQUISITION
Marta Filičková
Pages: 301-312
Publié: 25 Aug 2014
Vues: 4,265
Téléchargements: 1,259
Citations: 3 (Google Scholar)
Résumé: According to research in mother tongue (L1) reading skills, successive processing - the PASS Theory of Intelligence process - affects reading skills through the sequential analysis and blending of phonemes and syllables. The present paper examines whether this cognitive process predicts also reading skills in English as a foreign language (EFL). A group of 81 pupils that had finished their first year of EFL study were administered tests measuring successive processing and EFL decoding sub-skills. The results proved significant relationship between successive processing and decoding skills. These findings emphasize the necessity of successive processing stimulation in FL reading instruction.
Mots-clés : successive processing, the pass theory of intelligence, decoding sub-skills, english as a foreign language (efl)
Citer cet article : Marta Filičková. THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE PROCESSING IN EFL (ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE) READING SKILLS ACQUISITION. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual & Society 8, 301-312 (2014). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000345/
Retour au sommaire du volume
© 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The Publisher and/or the editor(s) are not responsible for the statements, opinions, and data contained in any published works. These are solely the views of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The Publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim any liability for injury to individuals or property arising from the ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
