GROUP INTERACTIONS IN AN ORAL TEST OF ENGLISH COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Anie B. Attan
Страници: 245-257
Публикувана: 25 Aug 2014
Преглеждания: 4,600
Изтегляния: 752
Citations: 2 (Google Scholar)
Резюме: Does members’language ability affect one’s performance in agrouporal test of English communication skills?This paper addresses that issue in reference to two research questions, (1) how do candidates perform when emplaced in groups according to language ability?And (2) what are the differences in the oral interactions of the candidates in the different groups? Three groups of four, first semester diploma students of varying levels of language ability were tested. The instruments were a Group Discussion Test and a common rating scale. The group discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed. Results show that candidates grouped with those of same language ability performed better than those who were placed in a mixed language ability group. Additionally, candidates in themixed ability group did not exhibit more turn takings nor show better ability to express opinion. Implications for setting strategies for teaching-learning may be drawn from the study.
Ключови думи: group interactions, l2 candidates, turn-taking, equality, mutuality, shared goals
Цитирайте тази статия: Anie B. Attan. GROUP INTERACTIONS IN AN ORAL TEST OF ENGLISH COMMUNICATION SKILLS. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual & Society 8, 245-257 (2014). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000340/
Обратно към съдържанието на тома
© 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The Publisher and/or the editor(s) are not responsible for the statements, opinions, and data contained in any published works. These are solely the views of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The Publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim any liability for injury to individuals or property arising from the ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
