DISTINCTION BETWEEN ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN CHINA AND RUSSIA (SOVIET UNION)
Ivo Družić, Nora Mustać
Страници: 67-76
Публикувана: 22 Aug 2017
Преглеждания: 3,589
Изтегляния: 615
Citations: 3 (Google Scholar)
Резюме: Two of the most profound communist economies were Soviet Union and China. Both countries were engaged in transition from planned to market economy. However, the results have been almost the opposite. Communism in Soviet Union collapsed while Chinese transition is characterized by rapid emergence of the market economy. The paths of economic transition in these two countries were distinct, especially, the period when reforms started. Notably, many reasons caused the success of China, as well as Soviet crash. Nevertheless, while Russia has fully complied to International Monetary Fund and World Bank shock therapy transition model, China has established innovative gradual approach to the economic reforms and full market economy. In this paper we examine the cause of different success of transition in these countries and point out the key factors which cause it, such as initial conditions, political leadership and empirically-based pace of reforms.
Ключови думи: economic transition, shock therapy, gradual reforms, china, soviet union, russia
Цитирайте тази статия: Ivo Družić, Nora Mustać. DISTINCTION BETWEEN ECONOMIC TRANSITION IN CHINA AND RUSSIA (SOVIET UNION). Journal of International Scientific Publications: Economy & Business 11, 67-76 (2017). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001507/
Обратно към съдържанието на тома
© 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The Publisher and/or the editor(s) are not responsible for the statements, opinions, and data contained in any published works. These are solely the views of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The Publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim any liability for injury to individuals or property arising from the ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
