THE DISPROPORTION OF ALLOCATION UNDER THE GIVEN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Piotr Dniestrzański, Janusz Łyko
Pages: 118-126
Published: 21 Aug 2015
Views: 2,806
Downloads: 738
Abstract: There are several well known measures of the inequality of distribution of goods and burdens. One of them is for example the Gini coefficient. Applicability of such measures is limited when the use of disproportionate allocation was intended. This is the case in the allocation of seats in the European Parliament. The Treaty of Lisbon provides that the distribution is done according to degressive proportionality with the specified minimum and maximum number of seats allocated to the smallest and largest Member State. These two conditions called boundary conditions at the outset determine the deviation from the proportional division. Therefore, there arises a problem of determining the measure of the disproportion of allocation under the given boundary conditions. This article comprises the proposals for such measures and their application for the analysis of the distribution of seats in the European Parliament.
Keywords: degressive proportionality, measure of degression, the boundary conditions, gini coefficient
Cite this article: Piotr Dniestrzański, Janusz Łyko. THE DISPROPORTION OF ALLOCATION UNDER THE GIVEN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Economy & Business 9, 118-126 (2015). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000851/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.