CHINESE PRACTICE OF RESEARCH-BASED LEARNING IN BASIC PHYSICS EDUCATION
Duohao Yin, Jun Yang, Xiaohu Zhou, Jian Liu
Pages: 359-369
Published: 1 Oct 2022
Views: 305
Downloads: 27
Abstract: The construction of physics education courses based on research-based learning has become the focus of curriculum reform in many countries. In China, situational and experimental teaching methods were encouraged by the new curriculum standards, so it is necessary to introduce research-based learning in basic physics teaching. In this study, the specific implementation and case design of research-based learning were explored and practised. Using Newton's second law as an example, the application of the research-based learning model in senior-high school physics education was discussed, and countermeasures for implementing research-based learning were proposed. The results show that the application of research-based physics learning can effectively improve students' scientific skills and learning outcomes, and therefore suggest that high school physics teachers draw on this model when implementing research-based learning.
Keywords: research study, high school physics, newton's second law, case design
Cite this article: Duohao Yin, Jun Yang, Xiaohu Zhou, Jian Liu. CHINESE PRACTICE OF RESEARCH-BASED LEARNING IN BASIC PHYSICS EDUCATION. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives 20, 359-369 (2022). https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1002403/
Download full text
Back to the contents of the volume
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Disclaimer: The opinions and claims presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their affiliated organizations, the publisher, editors, or reviewers.